Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haswell Grange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted (to remove copyvio history) and redirected to Baxterwood Priory. bd2412 T 18:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Haswell Grange

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not counting the amount of WP:IBID on the page, not enough references to satisfy WP:GNG. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Nominator Comment: I have repaired all instances of WP:IBID on the page. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment, so nothing was actually built (based on the title i was going to add this afd to the architecture list, but no:)), as notibility is shaky without more sources it would be good if/when this is deleted that there was a good redirect target, oh, heres one - Baxterwood Priory:))Coolabahapple (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm actually against redirecting to this article in particular as the proposed target doesn't even mention the monastery. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment -- A grange is a farm belonging to a monastery. I do not know the subject or the sources, but they look reputable RS.  It looks to me like a case of land given for monastic endowment, not as a place where a monastery was founded.  It has the feel of someone trying to make more from the sources than they will support.  However, I am not sure if the appropriate solution is to merge to the history section of a village or the foundation section of the priory that was built or both. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete (changing from the above). This appears to be a COPY-VIO of VCH, Durham which is still probably in copyright.  A redirect to Baxterwood Priory (perhaps with slight amendment) would also work. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 04:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.