Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hat Putato (0th nomination)

Hat Putato
See previous. --fvw *  22:52, 2004 Dec 16 (UTC)
 * Please note that individual entries should be self-contained or else explicitly refer to previous entries. There is only a "previous" if you're seeing this on the main VfD page. (And no, I am of course not voting, though it would be a resounding delete if I were.) 82.92.119.11 22:56, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|GeorgeStepanek\talk ]] 22:50, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't anybody bother to read Wikipedia guidelines before making articles anymore? [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 22:55, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. More trollery. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 00:04, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Leave it be!. These articles are informative, and helps people to know what is and isn't tolerable behavior on the internet.
 * Comment. Left unsigned by User:Johnissoevil, whose two contributions are to VfD nominations. And indeed he is. 82.92.119.11 23:05, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was me who did do the "bil kulin" article, but the "hat putato" article was started by someone else, don't know who...I just modified it to link to the bil kulin article. But to your credit, I will say this.  If you feel it should be deleted, that's your opinion.  I'm only trying to spread the word, considering I now have to put up with the post over in two wrestling newsgroups. [[User:Johnissoevil|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 18:06, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Please do not forge my signature, User:Johnissoevil. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 23:58, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this one as well. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. - Lucky 6.9 23:16, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's just a short-lived online fad. P Ingerson 23:40, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, patent nonsense. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 23:49, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I believe this is a speedy as a resurrection of a deleted article, because I distinctly remember the associated vandalism spree. But it's not showing up as having been deleted under this title, so hmm. Ambi 00:02, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete: An attempt at trolling by other means: the "Hey, 'member when Hat Putato? That was so cool!" impulse. Reprehensible. Geogre 01:56, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Andre Engels 02:46, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy, prank, nonsense. Wyss 03:46, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Not complaining about the votes here, but if this is being recommended for deletion, then shouldn't http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuck be recommended, too?? Johnissoevil
 * "Fuck" is not an obscure Usenet joke; it is perhaps the second most offensive word we have in the English language, used everywhere the language is spoken. Please explain how this even compares in terms of notability. [[User:Livajo|&#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#9786;]] 15:40, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Point well taken. User:Johnissoevil