Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatam Ali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Hatam Ali

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. I contested the PROD procedurally on the grounds that the article had previously deleted by PROD. The delete rationale remains valid nonetheless. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - failure to meet WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG as the individual in question has not played in a fully professional club league or played international football at senior level. C 679 10:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 15:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: While he has played in the Iraqi Premier League he is still not notable as the IPL in Iraq is not fully-pro. Also this player fails GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 20:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article is about a footballer that hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fail WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.