Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatch Labs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Hatch Labs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The relationship with Tinder is not enough for notability & there is nothing else. It's already mentioned in the Tinder article, so there's nothing worse merging. .  DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. I could not find significant coverage of the company in any independent reliable sources. Content could be merged into the Tinder article but not worth keeping on its own. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unremarkable & sources are insufficient to meet CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.