Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hate That I Love You (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect and protect, target = Good Girl Gone Bad. Protection should decrease the chance of a new article being created until/if there is sufficient notability to justify it; redirection is ok as this would qualify as Template:R to list entry. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 17:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Hate That I Love You (song)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The same as when I nominated it for deletion when it had a different name: Articles for deletion/Hate That I Love You. The song is not much more notable now than it was then, and it's still not a single. All I could find was rumors and blogs; nothing reliable at all. This seems to be crystal-ballism again. The original, "Hate That I Love You", is salted. Acalamari 20:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Rihanna stated on 106 & Park on the date July 20, 2007 during an interview that "Hate That I Love You" is the fourth single from her album Good Girl Gone Bad after Don't Stop The Music (Rihanna song).I don't see how its crystal-ballism when the artist herself confirms this.Bigga123 21:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The artist is not a reliable source. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete, perhaps even speedy. I can't find any reliable sources verifying this as the next single. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (and ThatGrapeJuice.net is not a reliable source.) Re-create the article if and when the single is released. Precious Roy 21:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * How is the artist not a reliable source? I was watching the moment she confirmed this on 106 & Park. I suggest keeping the artcle for now, and if things change then delete this article. Bigga123 21:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Read WP:RS, it lists what is and is not a reliable source. Word-of-mouth interviews are typically not reliable. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Good Girl Gone Bad. "X is the next single" is never enough to warrant an article.  Good album articles will have a section about singles or the songs, so it's enough to mention this song there.  When it's released, information about the song should be spun off into a separate article.  17Drew 22:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Redirect I agree with 17Drew. Don't delete the article, just redirect for the time being until some articles are posted on the internet. But I'm positive, Rihanna did confirm this on Jul 20, 2007. Bigga123 14:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy would have been fine. Sources, future looking, and doesn't help that it sounds like a press release. Pharmboy 23:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect, per 17Drew. Iotha 01:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom and Precious Roy. I'm sick of seeing articles like this.  They all end up deleted anyway (eg. Articles for deletion/Get Back (Britney Spears song) and Articles for deletion/More (Black Eyed Peas song))—  *H  ¡ρρ¡ ¡ρρ¡   07:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. And I think interested people should vote on this debate too! :) RaNdOm26 12:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please don't canvass, RaNdOm26. Risker 23:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.