Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hate group/Ex-PremiesPart2

Talk:Hate group/Ex-PremiesPart2

 * who deleted this page without waiting the customary 5 days? --Zappaz 03:25, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned talk page with contents that don't have anything to do with Wikipedia. This is a continuation of Talk:Hate group/ex-premies, also in VfD above. jni 17:46, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Strongest possible DELETEI don't care if these people aren't serious, just kidding, or whatever the hell their excuse is. Hosting death threats and such has the potential to get WP in very hot water, not to mention bad press, and must be deleted ASAP. Starblind 17:54, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * DELETE, Wikipedia is not a playfield for cultists and exers (which i am myself, due to my resume). That was and still is my strongest opinion. I couldn't stay away from this because allegations were made that concerned my former life, that are just blatant lies. This is not stuff for an encyclopedia anyway. I personally think that this is a threat for wikipedia because many related articles got influenced by this. Bertelsmann will have it easy to proof that wikipedia is nonserious if this goes on. Thomas h 18:45, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * "Bilge" is too kind a description here. Delete.  Edeans 20:41, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Yep, delete. RickK 21:25, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * Subcontrainfrabilge. Delete. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 22:19, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I see this is already deleted, but I just have to ask -- what does "Subcontrainfrabilge" mean"? RoySmith 02:17, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, spedily if possible. Thryduulf 23:34, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete contains libellous nonsense about ex-premie Jim H. Andries 00:09, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as fast as possible, not an article, possible libel. Wyss 00:42, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Speed deleted: patent nonsense, vandalism, lack of context. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:52, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - contains information pertaining the association made on the hate group article about the ex-premie group being labeled as a hate group. This is part of the talk page and should be kept on record as it was intergral part of the dicussion that ensued in Talk:hate group. --Zappaz 03:23, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * If you want this back, you'll probaly gladly reveal your identity to take over responsibility for that. In court you will have opportunity enough to state your view 195.169.149.55
 * Is this an anonymous threat? LOL! --Zappaz 17:06, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as context-less, unverified and probably unverifiable, and very probably libellous. Also spell out for those who like playing silly games that Delete does not mean "move the same material to another page," which is more than likely how this article came to be in the first place. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:02, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * PLEASE NOTE:. The original page was a subset of the talk page (Talk:Hate group) and was provided there as substantiation (grounded or not) for the claims made against the ex-premies being a hate group. As far as I know, Talk pages and its subsets do not fall under the Deletion_policy or Candidates_for_speedy_deletion. This subset of the talk page was deleted by an admin, without waiting for the customary 5 days, and re-posted again. This page need to be Kept as it is a subset of a Talk page that should not be deleted according to WP policy. --Zappaz 22:27, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)