Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hate group/ex-premies

Talk:Hate group/ex-premies, Hate group/ex-premies
who deleted this page without waiting the customary 5 days? --Zappaz 03:26, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

A Talk page for an article which does not exist. Very POV and potentially libelous. RickK 10:46, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - contains information pertaining the association made on the hate group article about the ex-premie group being labeled as a hate group. This is part of the talk page and should be kept on record as it was intergral part of the dicussion that ensued in Talk:hate group.--Zappaz 03:23, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * vote removed as the editor split their vote for the newly added article page below. --fvw *  03:45, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)
 * Delete. Orphaned talk page. Wikipedia is not an archive for expremie.org chatroom. jni 15:40, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. especially because part of the entries are faked. All of those are taken out of context. I don't know how much of this would cross the line from civil law to penal law, 'cause i am not experienced with american law, hope the disclaimer keeps Wikipedia clean from this. What about Talk:Hate group/Ex-PremiesPart2? This is the continuation of this article and deserves the same treatment. Thomas h 16:26, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Just submitted that one to VfD also. jni 17:50, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Strongest possible DELETEI don't care if these people aren't serious, just kidding, or whatever the hell their excuse is. Hosting death threats and such has the potential to get WP in very hot water, not to mention bad press, and must be deleted ASAP. Starblind 17:52, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yikes!! Concur. Edeans 20:31, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Surely this stuff is copyvio and should be blanked forthwith? GeorgeStepanek\talk  23:25, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I read part of it. I'm still not sure what it is, but I'm sure it should be deleted  RoySmith 00:16, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete ASAP, not an article, poss. libel. Wyss 00:48, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Speed deleted: patent nonsense, vandalism, lack of context. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:53, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I've added the corresponding article to this VfD, it was marked as a speedy but isn't. Delete for both though. --fvw *  19:40, 2005 Jan 15 (UTC)


 * Delete as context-less, unverified and probably unverifiable, and very probably libellous. Also spell out for those who like playing silly games that Delete does not mean "move the same material to another page," which is more than likely how this article came to be in the first place. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:02, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * PLEASE NOTE:. The original page was a subset of the talk page (Talk:Hate group/ex-premies) and was provided as substantiation (grounded or not) for the claims made against the ex-premies being a hate group. As far as I know, Talk pages and its subsets do not fall under the Deletion_policy or Candidates_for_speedy_deletion. This subset of the talk page was deleted by an admin, without waiting for the customary 5 days, and re-posted again under Hate group/ex-premies. What needs to be done is
 * delete Hate group/ex-premies, for the obvious reasons stated above, and
 * Keep Talk:Hate group/ex-premies as it is a subset of a Talk page that should not be deleted. --Zappaz 22:27, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)