Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatem El-Nashar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hatem El-Nashar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Career is not yet very important--still a junior official. All the refs are to his own work, or are mere notices.  DGG ( talk ) 23:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources found to demonstrate notability or support the creation of an article. Fails general notability and fails notability for politicians. Article was created by subject. JBH (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 04:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 04:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

It does not make any sense to accept articles on Wikipedia about some names of Miss Egypt pageant, who did not win any prizes for the country; and on the other hand delete articles of people who have –and still continue- to contribute with their work for the benefit of their country and community. If Miss Egypt is on Wikipedia because she has represented Egypt in a beauty contest, the diplomats have represented the country for many years. Politicians are known by their contributions in the political arena, locally, regionally and internationally. Like other articles, this one allows unregistered users to contribute by improving the work itself and tracking the progress as it is developed. The criteria must be applied for all. I would like to invite you (only 5 minutes of your time) to have a look on articles done under Category:Egyptian diplomats on Wikipedia. The only articles to pass with clear evidence are those belonging to the Ministers, UN members and holders of international or regional offices; many articles do not fall under the notability criterias (as ambassadorships are not considered international offices according to WP) WP:NPOLITICIAN. La petite chouchou (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can not find any evidence to indicate that the article passes WP:GNG of WP:NPOLITICIAN. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 06:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems to be created by the subject, or someone close to him, given the username involved. Kiwi128 (talk) 08:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is an effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. The subject is a well known diplomat in Cairo, like many other distinguished Egyptian diplomats.
 * Keep – Obvious Double standard with similar articles and job description on Wikipedia. No evidence to indicate that the other articles passes too.. Sens Salsero (talk)24 February 2015.  — Preceding undated comment added 21:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a policy based reason for keeping an article. Oh! Welcome to Wikipedia and congratulations on your very first edit! JBH (talk) 21:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Too junior for inherent notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor diplomat - sources don't show how he otherwise meets WP:GNG. Refs #1-7 are listings. Refs #8-15 are works he personally wrote. Ref #16 is a routine mention. Haven't found anything useful from searching. Fuebaey (talk) 03:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per nom, ceradon, and Fuebaey; article currently does not have reliable, independent sources that establish notability for WP:GNG or WP:NPOLITICIAN and I was unable to locate any such sources. Shanata (talk) 15:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.