Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatesex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  06:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Hatesex

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:OR, a dicdef, and a copyright violation to top everything off (compare to here). I'm not even sure if the band is notable either... SeizureDog 10:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the band may be notable, judging by Google, but this WP:NEO neologism doesn't look like it is. Moreschi Request a recording?


 * Comment - Please fix or clarify the AFD - based on what I see, I think you intend to delete Hatesex (band), but you're only going after Hatesex. --Sigma 7 14:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm only nominating Hatesex for now, but it appears that it was only created due to there being a band of the same name, which I also have doubts about. Since I am only unsure about its notability, I just brought it up in case anyone else wants to nominate it as well. --SeizureDog 14:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a self-promoting neologism. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  21:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as Chairman S.. Springnuts 23:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've been watching this page for a while, just because I thought it didn't belong. Lose it. stephan.com 21:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Although I created the article in question, I have this general, unbiased question: How is this article any different than, say, Pegging or Zipless fuck? --Saaga 17:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.