Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:35, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hatil

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Since this is a company, WP:NCORP guidelines apply. None of the references meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability. The existing references mostly fails WP:ORGIND/WP:CORPDEPTH.  HighKing++ 21:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies,  and Bangladesh.  HighKing++ 21:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. 2A01:4C8:1C00:3884:A196:1239:C503:533 (talk) 22:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources 1 and 2.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Response Sources must meet NCORP guidelines in order to count towards notability - multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", is defined as original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. In order to count towards notability, references cannot rely entirely solely on information provided by the company, including quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews etc.
 * Your first reference, The Daily Star is a profile of the chairman and managing director and the last section is about the general furniture market. There is no "Independent Content" and this reference fails ORGIND.
 * The second reference from TBS fails for the same reason. All the information is provided by the company and I cannot identify any "Independent Content" that (a) is clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the company and (b) meets CORPDEPTH.
 * Neither of those sources meet NCORP guidelines for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 12:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

There are several more sources in the article and many Bengali language sources which can be found on Google. Gorlono (talk) 07:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: To discuss sourcing Gorlono IDed Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  16:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG and WP:NCORP with the following sources.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.