Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatred of a Minute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 22:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Hatred of a Minute

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found nothing suitable to pass WP:NEXIST at Newspapers.com and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a link at DVD Talk; needs more coverage in order to be eligible. The Film Creator (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I found an AICN review and added it along with the DVD Talk one. I concur with the newspapers search. The best one I found was this, but it's too short to be seen as a review for my tastes. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * This comes up in a search. I don't know what it has in it. I'm leaning towards it being a trivial source, but hopefully there's more. At the very least it would still be helpful in adding info since it covers a search for investors. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If anyone can access them, this and look somewhat promising but there's not enough to determine if they're actually usable or if they're just trivial sources. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Other than that, I think I've thoroughly mined for possible coverage and found not much more than you have. I suppose very technically this could pass, but it's not enough for me to really be comfortable with a keep given the otherwise lack of coverage or anything truly promising that would imply more coverage. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for finding the Ain’t It Cool News review, User:ReaderofthePack. In my opinion, I consider the reviews from both AICN and DVD Talk as sufficient enough to pass WP:NFILM.  However, I don’t want to withdraw the nomination too soon unless consensus agrees that the two aforementioned reviews suffice.   And if this discussion will be closed as “no consensus,” I’ll be completely fine with that. The Film Creator (talk) 15:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Both DVD Talk and AICN are reliable sources. Donald D23   talk to me  23:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this nomination per consensus. The DVD Talk and AICN reviews suffice. The Film Creator (talk) 12:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.