Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatteras Financial Corp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hatteras Financial Corp

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of this establishes actual independent notability and substance since it's simply a business listing as the sole sources are their own business listings, nothing better was found My hat's unsurprising for such a trivial company. Our policies are clear about company advertising and this one is no different. SwisterTwister  talk  16:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: The history of this article shows a couple of points when WP:PROD was discussed, initially rejected because of the firm's stock market listing. The sources remained insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH though, and my searches have been finding mere routine announcements. But most significantly, there was an April 2016 announcement that Annaly Capital Management, Inc were acquiring Hatteras Financial Corp . This is presumably why previous primary references are now dead links. A redirect is possible, but I am not seeing evidence that this firm met the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 03:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 03:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Surprisingly fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH which is unusual given it has (had) a NYSE listing. -- HighKing ++ 17:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.