Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hattie Durham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to  List of Left Behind characters. j⚛e deckertalk 05:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Hattie Durham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A fictional character with no reliable third person sources to justify a solo article therefore should be worst deleted. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 11.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 00:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete A check of the reliable sourcing reveals no notability for the character which is independent of the book series. Nwlaw63 (talk) 04:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking any reliable sourcing for verification or notability. —   fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  17:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect this, and the whole lot of other articles for the individual characters, to List of Left Behind characters as its tower of proposed merge banners suggests. Very little actual merging is required. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.