Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hattons of London


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 11:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Hattons of London

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND.  scope_creep Talk  00:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - In my WP:BEFORE mostly what I could find were brief mentions in coverage of the sale of specific coins, or equally brief mentions in the winning of minor prizes. Inclusion on this list and this profile piece in the same local paper was probably the closest in terms of WP:SIGCOV, but then there's WP:AUD to consider and even ignoring WP:AUD we still need coverage in different publications. Such is the popularity of numatism that I'm pretty sure they'll become sufficiently notable enough to warrant an article at some point in the future, but not now. Fails WP:CORP. FOARP (talk) 11:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I notice the company is doing TV adverts in the UK. I saw one last night. I thought it was the British mint advertising the coins, but it's them. They have been doing it for a good while, same format. By the end of this year they will probably be very well known, certainly in the UK.   scope_creep Talk  10:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:PROMO. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Thank you for sharing your feedback, I contributed to article amendments during August. Whilst there are references to regional media titles such as Stoke Sentinel, however I have included the Sunday Times article as a reference. Sources were not limited to regional media – alongside the Sunday Times, I counted Real Business, UK charity SSAFA and Daily Record. I appreciate the above comments about the enduring popularity of numismatics and the impact of our TV advertising. I would like to counter these point - I think a company that has been profiled by the Sunday Times must be regarded as being of importance and notable. Of course, any further insight or guidance you could provide to help me publish the draft would be very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sala90 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked for WP:UPE. MER-C 12:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - paid-for spam tendentiously moved into mainspace. MER-C 12:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ORGIND and is spam.  HighKing++ 20:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.