Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haunted Hollow (Alton Towers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Alton Towers. Jenks24 (talk) 10:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Haunted Hollow (Alton Towers)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article seems to be not notable, and has no sources. Fails V and has no RS accept a link to the Theme Park's site. Image has also been up for deletion, article is also a stub, overall article not notable. Page should also be renamed to Haunted Hollows. — M.Mario  (T/C) 20:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Alton_Towers - Google News archives found minor results which were not useful, the 6th result from the top appeared to be useful but it requires payment. I would suggest redirecting but "Haunted Hollow" with parentheses may be an unlikely search term. SwisterTwister   talk  21:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. A pathway?  LOL.  It ain't exactly the Yellow Brick Road, is it? Qworty (talk) 23:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect per SisterTwister.--Charles (talk) 21:07, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge back to Alton Towers. It is notable, but individual visitor attractions there are not.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.