Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haunted Mansion (Knoebels)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Haunted Mansion (Knoebels)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely unreferenced article on a specific amusement park ride with no real assertion of notability (it comes closest with "The Haunted Mansion is constantly awarded for it status as best traditional darkride by DAFE and Amusement Today", which this web page [not cited in the article] does seem to claim). The whole thing seems to be original research (for example, "The first stunt is...a scary-looking man who pulls-open a door while a automatic sound clip say [sic] "Welcome" in an eerie tone"), though it appears that the web page I linked to above was probably the source for much of the article. Unreferenced or not, I just can't see the notability here. A good rating by an online darkrides-enthusiast group just doesn't cut it. --Miskwito (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete – Advertisement. MuZemike 18:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – Cut and paste promotional article. badly needs wikification and removal of weasel words. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Procedural Comment – Please could somebody do a relist on this? I think there're initial signs of salvageability & sources; it'll take a little while to look into. I don't know that a 2nd relist'll need to run a full 7 days to reach consensus, but a few days at least would be helpful. –Whitehorse1 21:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for non-notability and OR - it's already had one re-list, don't need another. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.