Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haute Living (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Haute Living
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted here. Refs show that it exists (2 x Bloomberg) and it has passing refs. The only slightly weightier one is the Daily Mail which isn't considered a reliable or robust source. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 16:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Ref +Businessweek Updated. Debatable WP:GNG elements removed. Keep. Andydesher (talk) 16:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The article notes: "IN AN EFFORT to extend the company's portfolio, Haute Media Group is introducing a group of niche sites focused on the luxury consumer demographic. The move to launch these initial 5 media products came after HauteLiving.com, the national luxury lifestyle website for Haute, Living, began generating at least 20,000 unique visitors per day." Coverage in Adweek: http://www.adweek.com/fishbowlny/haute-living-happily-living-in-denial/11329, http://www.adweek.com/fishbowlny/haute-living-expands-to-eight-new-markets/16014, http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/eight-new-markets-are-haute-living/53534, and http://www.adweek.com/fishbowlny/carmelo-anthony-enters-the-magazine-business/75640.   <li> The article notes: "Haute Living CEO Kamal Hotchandani said, “We had the digital product pushed out [to] 8.2 million people before the print edition launched.” The result, he said: “We had 48,000 digital downloads in the first 24 hours.” Haute Time is one of a series of enterprises being spun out of Haute Living, a 9-year-old company that Hotchandani said has revenues north of $10 million a year." More coverage in the New York Post hereWebCite.</li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Haute Living to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 05:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)</li></ul>

<ul><li> Here are two more sources (though they might be unreliable, so I am not using them to establish notability since the above sources are sufficient):<ol> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>Cunard (talk) 05:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)</li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cunard's sources. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.