Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Havdalah.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Havdalah.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was prodded by User:DGG but then deprodded by User:Kvng; I agree with DGG so I'm bringing it to AfD. There's no indication of notability at all. Having thousands of viewers is maybe a credible claim of significance (which is why I'm not speedy deleting), but it's not even close to being a sufficient indicator of notability, and there's no other claim of notability in the article. Iago Qnsi (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Could not find any additional sources to establish notability. The one cited in the article does seem workable so if someone finds another, I could be convinced to change my !vote. ~Kvng (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. there are a number of such websites. There is no evidence that this particular one is significant. the only material I can find is he same as cited just above, and it is merely an announcement that it is going to be started.  DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  17:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as none of this suggests satisfying the applicable notability, best deleted for now restarted when better is available. SwisterTwister   talk  19:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The only thing noteworthy about the site is its creator. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 00:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.