Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HavenMuck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

HavenMuck

 * Can't find any indication of a large audience or outside interest, and with 132 google hits  I don't think this is going to pass WP:WEB. Kappa 16:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-noteworthy. Ifnord 17:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kappa. Again! RED LETTER DAY RasputinAXP  talk contribs 22:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and the article reads like a copy-paste from some web page anyway! (not that I can be bothered to google for that right now. =) If they can demonstrate some kind of wide player base, that's different. Too bad we don't have any notability criteria (that I know) for MUDs. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:02, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.