Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaii Free Press (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Hawaii Free Press
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable blog (yes, it says it's a distributed newspaper, but it's been a website since Dec 2008 . Dougweller (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable; it's a free, biweekly newspaper with an unveriifed but admittedly small circulation, handed out to promote a partisan viewpoint (as it freely admits on its "about us" page ). Its only claim to fame is that it was once noticed by the Washington Post. --MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's actually embarrassing that it hasn't disappeared yet. --Travis Thurston+ 02:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.