Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaii Roster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:38, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Hawaii Roster
Delete. This is a list of non-notable wrestlers from a non-notable, independent wrestling federation. It was moved to this page from Hawaii Championship Wrestling Roster to "keep from getting deleted" as the creator of the article stated in the history section of this page— after a speedy deletion tag was repeatedly removed by the creator. The editor of the article has failed to assert its importance, even after being warned that the article could be deleted. (Я не имею—никакой жизни 16:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC))


 * Delete per the above. --Darth Deskana (Darth Talk) 20:39, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm somewhat ambivalent about it. If they can provide information and people show interest, then it should stay.  As is, however, I would reccommend it for deletion as per the guidelines for vanity articles. Wizardry Dragon 22:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


 * ''Please don't take this personally, but you sound ignorant and stereo-type "white", when you say that this is a list of non-notable wrestlers from a non-notable wrestling federation. Non-notable by American and Western standards? Isn't this Wikipedia site for global viewing? The importance of the article was asserted by the act of simply moving it in order to protect it.There are people who genuinely want to know what is going on in the Pacific. It is very unfortunate that this article had to be moved to keep from becoming a victim of "speedy deletion" in the first place. It should go back to the original HAWAI'I CHAMPIONSHIP WRESTLING ROSTER page if WIKI will allow it. Also, what "specifically" is the problem according to the guidelines for vanity articles? I like the message in the article and wondered why you are having a problem with it.WrestlinghawaiiGhia (Wrestling Hawaii) 13:33, 18 April 2006


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.