Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaiian Airlines destinations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Redirect. Article already included on Hawaiian Airlines main page. Not enough content to warrent its own space. -bobby 16:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Hawaiian Airlines destinations


150.135.180.195 added this info into the main Hawaiian Airlines article today. Honestly, I think Hawaiian is small enough that it's not a big hindrance to have this list maintained in the main Hawaiian article as opposed to having a separate article to list their destinations. Hawaiian717 03:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Having a separate article follows the form of United Airlines destinations, American Airlines destinations, etc. Keep, no reason to delete.  --humblefool&reg; 03:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This is why I brought up the size issue. Horizon Air and SkyWest Airlines are examples of having the list on the same page (though those may be long enough to be split; Aloha Airlines on the other hand seems clearly short enough to keep where it is).  American and United serve many destinations worldwide and having the list on the main article page could easily overwhelm the article.  I don't think this is an issue with Hawaiian. -- Hawaiian717 03:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I feel that articles should follow a standard format; the "...destinations" seems to be the standard, and should be kept throughout all airlines articles. In any case, even if you merged it into the main article, it would still be ineligible for deletion, because edit histories need to be retained.  --humblefool&reg; 04:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect seems reasonable to me. -- Hawaiian717 06:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds fine to me. --humblefool&reg; 06:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hawaiian Airlines. I think common sense should rule here. If a list of destinations is too bulky for the airline's main article (à la American Airlines destinations), then it merits its own article. For regional carriers like Hawaiian with a smaller list, inclusion in the main article is less obtrusive. Caknuck 05:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Caknuck. Someone has already copied into the main article and it doesn't make it too long. --Steve 05:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect, does not have a long list of destinations, so keeping it in the main article should be fine. --Ter e nce Ong (T 06:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.