Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk's Vengeance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hawk's Vengeance

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Film shows little to no evidence of notability (WP:NFILM or the WP:GNG). Tazerdadog (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It also seems to be known as Hawk's Revenge.  Establishing notability for direct-to-video Gary Daniels films would be very difficult, and I don't see anything beyond capsule reviews, which NFILM says can't establish notability.  Sometimes Black Belt does film reviews, and sometimes Billboard covered direct-to-video releases back in the dtv boom in the 1980s and early 1990s.  However, there doesn't seem to be anything indexed at Google Books or archive.org, the two places where I usually find these archived. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.