Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk-i (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  howch e  ng   {chat} 21:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Hawk-i
poor article, previously listed on Afd Articles_for_deletion/Hawk-i no improvement since august 2005 Melaen 21:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

*Delete per nom. The all caps makes me think it might be a copyvio of some radio ad copy, but I can't find evidence of it online. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - might not be salvageable at all. Written in all caps, serious POV problem ("IT'S THE RIGHT CHOICE") that could be considered advertising, written in second person (and Wikipedia articles are never written in second person!). The current article reads like a radio public service announcement. If this is a notable State program in Iowa that meets the Wikipedia standards for inclusion, it might be better to scrape this clean and start anew. B.Wind 22:37, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep rewrite per JLa. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. I've edited the article so it's at least coherent. Given the debate within the US over health insurance, I think this is notable enough. However, instead of an article per state, I would prefer to be able to redirect this to a more general article about states' suplements to Medicaid and then list the states' programs there. I didn't find a suitable redirect though. -- JLaTondre 15:43, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per ESkog. Stifle 01:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * weak keep: I see no reason to delete the article as it stands. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 02:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.