Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk-mo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Hawk-mo
Imaginary Haircut. I was very close to speedying under nonsense or nn, but I wanted to see what you all think. Karmafist 19:22, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete at normal speed This in no way fits any CSD criterion . It is, however, a dicdef, which wiki is not WP:ISNOT --CastAStone 20:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * It is referred to in the mohawk hairstyle as a "reverse mohawk". "Hawk-mo" is just silly. Punkmorten 20:31, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * -Punkmorten: I didn't see it in there, but I didn't check the article history.
 * -CastAStone: I disagree with you there, Websters barely put in "Chick Flick". Hawk-Mo is a neologism at best, jibberish at worst. Karmafist 22:38, 4 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Neologism, dicdef.  And not imaginary:  I shaved a strip front-to-back through my Afro when I was a hippie living in a house full of hardcore punks with traditional mohawks.  Barno 18:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The haircut might have existed before, but did the phrase exist before? That's what I meant by imaginary -- i've heard it been called a "reverse mohawk" before. Karmafist 20:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, my friends used the terms "no-hawk" and "reverse mohawk", but never "hawk-mo". The term is imaginary, as is the need for this article, but the hairstyle itself is real (albeit non-notable).  Barno 19:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.