Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk (designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 03:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Hawk (designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST with no reliable secondary sources, just a tweet and a Flickr photo. Can't find any press coverage of the artist's Digital Paisley work, and we haven't got much to work with otherwise, for an artist with a common one-word pseudonym and no stated real name. The possible-COI creator User:Hawk Visions has declined to add any reliable sources since opposing a prod a couple of days ago. McGeddon (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -Citation Source must be from different trusted domains like newspaper, magazines, etc., It seems that there is no proper citations in this article. I recommend to delete this article(Williamahendric (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.