Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawk and Chicken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Traditional games in the Philippines. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Hawk and Chicken

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a How-To guide. This article does not refer to any social importance. It would be better off at WikiHow, whose purpose if to host "how-to" type entries. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Suggest redirect instead of deletion - to Traditional games in the Philippines, as mentioned below --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOT RadioFan (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above-- Pookeo9 Talk If you need anything  17:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:MADEUP WP:WP. Joe Chill (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment As the game is mentioned in A study of Philippine games By Mellie Leandicho Lopez, it is not made up. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge to list of Filipino Children's games or keep. See, , Page 52 of . Less of of howto than a documentation of games played. Hobit (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment From what I can see, all of those sources mention how to play - but not the social relevance, or detailed history, etc of the game. That is why I recommended (both in this AfD, and on the creator's talk page) that it might be better off on WikiHow --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 18:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd like to suggest we merge all discussions on these articles on Philippines games to . I think this issue has been addressed there fairly well by Phil. Hobit (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, normally I'd agree with Steve, but in this case I'm gonna have to disagree with the AfD propsal. I see NO reason why this article needs to be deleted. But then, my opinions and suggestions mostly go unheard... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added Bati-Cobra, Calahoyo ("Hole-in"), Lawin at Sisiw ("Hawk and Chicken") and Sambunot to Traditional games in the Philippines, as I feel that this is a more appropriate location for them --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 09:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I now think that this article should not be deleted, but redirected to Traditional games in the Philippines, as all the information is now there, and so there is no need for a separate article. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 09:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment : I agree with this. Redirecect might be fine if the information contained in the oresent article is prenet in the target article. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * If RadioFan, Pookeo9 and JoeChill are willing to change their !votes, I am willing to perform a non-admin closure and create the redirect as mentioned above. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.