Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hay Day (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments housekeeping non-admin closure czar  ♔   16:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Hay Day
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. (I must confess to coming here from what is possibly the most cringeworthy advert on television - of course a pig fucking gives you bacon!) Laun  chba  ller  08:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * That'll teach me not to check the history first. Article was voted to be kept 'without prejudice' just over two months ago. Considering withdrawal.-- Laun  chba  ller  08:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Right, I've given it some thought, removed two sections under WP:CRUFT and fixed the thumbnail, and I am probably going to go through with this. Without the unsourced WP:PLOT section, the article looks like this.-- Laun  chba  ller  09:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Per Odie5533's reasoning in original AFD. -- ferret (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not a page I'd be proud of, but it meets the GNG with reviews from standard game review sites: Gamezebo, Pocket Gamer, and CNET. There is also plenty of commentary already linked by Odie in the previous AfD. As for the article's state, it has no impact on the notability, especially as it doesn't use the multiple reliable articles already linked. Withdrawal recommended, as I can't see this going another way, despite the bacon. czar ♔   16:31, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * , ping czar ♔   03:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Adding the "|p=" bit to the ping template breaks the echo for some reason, but withdrawn.-- Laun  chba  ller  08:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, all of the reviews makes it notable. This nomination should be closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frmorrison (talk • contribs) 01:59, 8 July 2014‎ (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.