Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayat Al-Fahad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:45, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Hayat Al-Fahad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is the community content to keep this biography of a living person in the mainspace? —S Marshall T/C 19:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete this non-notable actor, per WP:ONEEVENT. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: this short stub shows that she has the title role in a notable TV series, for a start, but the Arabic wikipedia article has what appears to be a large filmography ranging from 1962 to 2020, and 34 sources. I don't read Arabic but it seems unlikely that she is not notable. Needs expansion, not deletion. Pam  D  09:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If that's the consensus, then I think we should draftify it until an Arabic speaker carries out the translation you suggest. In its current state, as a poorly-sourced BLP this is unsuited to the mainspace.—S Marshall T/C 10:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or Draftify per WP:NPOSSIBLE and .Less Unless (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The nomination does not seem to suggest the subject lacks notability: in fact she seems very well known. The Arabic Wikipedia article gives some idea of how widely she has been written about. (I understand no Arabic so I am relying on Google.) However, the article is presently not BLP-compliant through severe lack of balance. The section "Controversy" should be removed but possibly reinstated whenever a full biography has been produced. Alternatively a (weirdly-tagged) earlier version such as this could be restored. Indeed, pending all this, the article could be moved to draft space. Thincat (talk) 11:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly passes wp:gng I also added a couple of wp:rs to the article.  Dtt1 Talk  12:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 01:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: The arabnews.com article claims that she is famous, which is supported by the over 30 sources in her Ar.wiki] page. There is definitely a language/cultural barrier here that needs to be addressed in terms of article upkeep but the subject by herself has been established to be notable. — BriefEdits (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.