Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayat Pharma Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Hayat Pharma Canada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable Company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is primary and listings. Nothing better found. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 *  Delete  I could not find any negative sources. Daniel kenneth (talk[&section=new + ]·[ tag]·contribs ·deleted contribs ·[ logs]·[ filter log] ·block user ·[ block log]·SUL·CA·[ checkuser] ([ log])) 09:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this actually suggests any solid independent notability especially considering it's a rather newly founded company. SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough independent coverage to pass WP:ORG Amccann421 (talk) 04:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks multiple reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Googling turned up nothing useful.  Msnicki (talk) 05:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.