Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayek Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 20:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Hayek Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

LSE student society that used to produce a written journal which went defunct and was been recreated as a website, can't find evidence that it meets our notability criteria. Dougweller (talk) 06:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose – clicks on Scholar and Books (above) come up with lots of results (which need parsing). A search on HighBeam Research for the editors came up with many more results. It's latest (perhaps last) Journal was issued in 2011 . The 2010-11 Journal editors are all associated with the LSE. Perhaps it is defunct, but is notability restricted to current notability? I think not. Recommend retaining the article -- it needs development, not deletion.--S. Rich (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)15:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, they need parsing. I can see that the journal is used as a source but not discussion of the Hayek Society at LSE. Dougweller (talk) 13:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply Here's an idea. First, Hayek Society gets put into the LSE or History of the LSE article as a subsection. I'm not sure what to do next. As there are different HSs around (Bulgaria, Japan, Germany, and the LSE), a DAB page is set up rather than a simple redirect. Until the DAB is done, a redirect to the LSE would work.--S. Rich (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * DElete -- I cannot beleive that a student society, even in such a prestigious institution as LSE, is notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I have added HS to the LSE article and stricken my opposition above.--S. Rich (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.