Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley Long


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn I found lots more references for her works. Triwbe (talk) 07:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hayley Long

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks independant reveiws to pass WP:CREATIVE - Probably too early to create the article now. Triwbe (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Triwbe (talk) 14:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Fails WP:Prof. Any notability would have to be on basis as a writer not an academic/educator. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC),
 * Weak delete. Teaching secondary school is obviously not of any particular significance (though I listed her in the "academics and educators" sorting list because of it), but her fiction is getting her closer to notability. I found (highbeam links, not full articles) A review of Hill and Fire in The Independent (by Laurence Phelan, November 28, 2004), and a profile of her in her local (Cardiff) newspaper Western Mail (Wales): Action on the train from Aber, November 29, 2004. If there were a few more like that, especially like the second one and in more of a national venue, I'd probable vote to keep, but the rest of the relevant Google news hits seemed to be serialized fiction by her rather than anything about her, and I don't think these two are quite enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Good work, if we can find a bit more on her it's probably a keeper. --Triwbe (talk) 07:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.