Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haymaker (Pokémon)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-09 08:35Z 

Haymaker (Pokémon)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is completely unencyclopedic - not only that, it's got an awful lot of POV and OR in it. Cipher (Yell) 15:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge somewhere: I'm actually pretty sure that I've heard of this deck type way back in that day. Which is saying something considering that I didn't even play the game. --SeizureDog 17:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm not saying that CCG decks can't be notable (I'd love to see an article on some of the old Magic: The Gathering power decks, I bet the Necrodeck could at least pass muster), but this article doesn't establish notability or provide sources.  --UsaSatsui 11:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. No reliable sources. Is WP:OR--Sefringle 23:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone comes up with a source. -Ryanbomber 16:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete solely on the basis of failing WP:RS. I too have heard of this deck type even though I never played the game and think it could probably use a mention on the relavent TCG game page (assuming it's not already there.) Tiakalla 06:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.