Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haynes West End


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 12:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Haynes West End

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not an obviously notable hamlet in the middle of nowhere. Sources are maps (which publish every place everywhere) and a trivial passing mention in a newspaper. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge into Haynes, Bedfordshire if not deemed notable.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 13:04, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per CSD G5. Highly malicious and deceptive user who was just site banned after getting caught socking, and was blocked by consensus of the community before that. The principles in WP:BMB applies here. We don’t need to assess anything else. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete---Essentially per . ~ Winged Blades Godric 13:28, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no notability whatsoever, meets criteria for WP:A7 and WP:G5. Adding speedy delete template under G5 as that is the most agreed upon main reason. --Kirbanzo (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Why does this page meet criteria A7? See User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7 before you answer. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

*Comment I think it is worth referring to the Domesday book ]. So not a trivial mention. It states that Haynes Church End being two fields away from the main village, which is clearly split in two, with  Haynes (which is unamed), the other called Haynes West End, clearly sign posted as such, with that name. Sometimes, if there was plague, they would burn the houses, to stop the spread of it, and it would split village into pieces. It could be that, that has led to this. I would suggest a Merge. scope_creep (talk) 01:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete You know, when you look at it, there is nothing to merge, apart from the passing mention of a name. scope_creep (talk) 01:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see a reason to delete, this source mentions that it is in the parish, so I would recommend Merge if nothing else.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 21:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep geography-related articles in stub forms can always be expanded upon and there's no need to claim that this article won't ever receive huge coverage, plus this article passed the articles for creation so plenty of well-experienced editors saw this article and believed it to be worthy to be included inside of Wikipedia. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) 10:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.