Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayrettin Karaoğuz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 07:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hayrettin Karaoğuz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unotable Turkish celebrity. Wgolf (talk) 22:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment appears to have a sourcable notability in Turkey. IE: Trend Turkey Gecce Magazine Vatan Gazete Gunes and others. The projects in which he took part also appear to have sourcable notability. Appears to meet WP:GNG and WP:ENT. Though sources are Turkish language, notable to Turkey is notable enough for en.Wikipedia. WP:NONENG. I will await input from editors better able to translate THESE. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 07:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  03:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry Userspace  Talk to me!   Stuff I have done  00:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per MQS - Passes GNG, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per being notable to Turkey and per WP:NONENG. For this non-English topic, Turkish-reading Wikipedians might be asked to improve it per available sources.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The article itself remains an unsourced BLP.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for kindly offering to add the sources to the article, I'm sure you'll do a grand job. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment-yes where are the sources? The only ones are unreliable. Wgolf (talk) 21:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * And your ability to read Turkish is established just how? Or perhaps you could direct me to the WP:RSN link to where Turkish sources Trend Turkey Gecce Magazine Vatan Gazete Gunes were declared unreliable? Or were you simply expressing personal opinion?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * -sorry I was referring to the article page-I didn't see any sources on here-but on the article there are only unreliable sources. Wgolf (talk) 05:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. I thought you ere referring to the sources I offered above... and which, among other found through WP:BEFORE, are NOW sourcing the article.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * withdraw-okay refs are added-and I wish I knew there was a Turkish wiki article... Wgolf (talk) 06:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Took some digging.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * and it is no longer an unsourced BLP. 06:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * We might request that the much more complete Hayrettin Karaoğuz article on the Turkish Wikipedia be translated and used for expansion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.