Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazardous powders testing kit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hazardous powders testing kit

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unnoteworthy scientific commercial product that entirely fails WP:GNG and any other guideline. I did an WP:BEFORE just to be safe and nothing that would satisfy notability came up. No citations in article, there's never been any citations in the article over the 16 years this has been rotting away in a dusty corner, cobwebs and all. Kind of amazed really. As cut and dry as you can get.

I was going to do this as a WP:PROD but apparently it went up for a very old VfD in 2005, so it's not eligible for a PROD. -- Tautomers (T C) 08:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't see what makes this testing kit by 2020Gene notable. I can't find sources supporting notability.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I could find sufficient evidence of notability. Suonii180 (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.