Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazelwood Jewelry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hazelwood Jewelry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not meet the WP:GNG. Both of the cited sources are dead links. One incoming link, which was added by the account that created this article. Raymie (t • c) 05:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete My search for reliable sources came up dry. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  08:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not finding much on this, other than purported use. I am more weary about the one ref which is too closely linked to an advert/selling site.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  20:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- No depth of coverage found via Google search besides advertisements, both refs are also just commercial sites. GABHello! 00:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.