Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He Bowls To The Left (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Restored redirect, recreation by self-confessed block-evading sockpuppet. Guy (help!) 13:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 

He Bowls To The Left

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was AfD'd back in 2012, with a consensus to redirect. Another editor has recreated the exact same article, with the single addition of one non-RS citation. As per ATD and the earlier AfD, I restored the redirect. The other editor has cited WP:CCC, so here we are.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect I think the redirect to content previously merged into the Mitchell Johnson article is the best option. WP:PAGEDECIDE says that we can make editorial decisions on whether a topic should have its own article or a section in a wider article. Spike &#39;em (talk) 11:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep As the original, there are sufficient reliable 3rd party sources available to support it's retention. Besides, the reason I brought it back was to assist in facilitating the restoration as he was the person who wanted it restored and I am sure he is going to be adding more sources shortly.  The C of E  God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 12:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep As for the document, I agree that there should be a Wikipedia page resembling this. When I was watching You tube videos, I saw this chant. When I searched up it on Wikipedia, it was redirected. I felt so rejected and sad. So well yeah, there are also enough sources (Third party, Second Party ect.) so I really think we should keep it as it is. By that I mean KEEP IT. Also replying to The C of E, I will add more sources. LlewynYiming (talk) 04:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Also, I have added more sources.LlewynYiming (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , WP:IFELTREJECTEDANDSAD is not an inclusion criterion on Wikipedia. Guy (help!) 13:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.