Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He Xiangyu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   14:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

He Xiangyu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertisement: writing style is overly promotional. Wcam (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - japantimes, Time, and additional results that come up in google news search indicate that there is sufficient notability to pass WP:GNG. I would agree that "Artwork" section is overly promotional, but that is not a sufficient reason to delete the article.--Staberinde (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep for now as it may need to be improved and if it can't after time, we can talk about it again. SwisterTwister   talk  06:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as uninitiated and I won't be able to correctly interpret the sources, but searching in Chinese should help: Promotional tone is still surmountable, unless you need a WP:TNT then no objection.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 10:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.