Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He Xiaopeng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Multiple sources available to prove notability, no reason to keep this discussion open further. (non-admin closure) Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

He Xiaopeng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is not notable. All of the references contain no content about the subject. AlanS (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. 180.172.239.231 (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Sources   --180.172.239.231 (talk) 22:49, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes notability threshold. Significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One further reference added to article. Philg88 ♦talk 06:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment This nomination is not for UCWeb or UC Browser. This nomination is for an un-notable individual as per WP:NRV. Working in a notable organisation that develops a notable product does not make an individual notable. AlanS (talk) 07:36, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but having a detailed biography published in a book and significant coverage as an individual right across the Chinese Internet does. Philg88 ♦talk 09:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep significant number of business sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.