Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He was a Crook

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Cool Hand Luke  07:39, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

He was a Crook
Source text, not an article. Probably copyrighted too. Should be delete. Thue | talk 21:20, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - comment: someone had copyviod it, but not put a source material. I've since updated that... Nick04 22:05, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur, delete as source material. Radiant! 08:43, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's definitely copyrighted.  theAtlantic.com owns it, I think, or perhaps Rolling Stone.  theAltantic.com now charges for admission to read it, though those other sites linked to appear to be fine with hosting it.  Either way, it doesn't belong here.  I posted to a talk page, then immediately deleted, then posted a link to the talk page's history/version that had it in there, and that needed to be taken down even (I think, as far as I can tell), so this should almost certainly be removed.  Now, (and if a seasoned Wikipedian perchances upon this voting place) I'm curious:  Can one link to the history/version of a page that gets deleted? Just curious. -209.6.22.123 02:47, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.