Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Head-Roc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I see no reason to salt, the article hasn't ever been recreated Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Head-Roc

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROMOTION. PROD was removed and a huge amount of additional unsourced material was added. Pburka (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Delete - an editor has commented that they will be adding sources for the additional info. I'll come back in a few days and cast my 'vote'. Sionk (talk) 02:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've voted 'delete' because no indepth, reliable sources have been added to the article. There are plenty of blog posts online by Head-Roc, but these are self-written. His 'Occupy D.C.' performance with Dead Prez was noticed in newsblogs, but IMO that does not on its own establish notability. Sionk (talk) 01:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Most of the newly added material was copied from http://www.beatmp3.net/artist/head-roc.html so I've removed it. This article has a history of copyvios from WP:SPAs. Pburka (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt. Wikipedia is not a preparation area for articles. Either an article meets inclusion criteria or not. Here it has not been shown to do so. Salting will ensure future copyvios are not an issue and of course the article can be created via AfC if (ever) notability is established. Cloudz 679 15:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for biographies. There does appear to be brief mentions in the news, but the coverage is fairly trivial. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.