Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HeadSpin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  22:51, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

HeadSpin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources don't meet WP:CORPDEPTH and are merely regurgitated press releases/entirely unsatisfactory e.g. Bloomberg profiles, Crunchbase profiles. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping me understand how to make this post better. I deleted the sources mentioned above (Bloomberg, Crunchbase) and added another news source in thier place. I tried to pattern entry after New Relic Is it okay now? Kate523 20:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article is written too much like an advertistment. Somewhat like a LinkedIn profile. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Reads like a press release, and is sourced by them, thus making it non-neutral and not sufficiently verifiable. RileyBugz 会話投稿記録 12:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: Edited again based on comments from others. All claims are verifiable. Kate523 —Preceding undated comment added 21:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not verifiable by independent sources, thus fails WP:GNG. No significant can average of the firm, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and it is actually a promotional article of small, non notable firm, and that's against core policy WP:NOTPROMO –Ammarpad (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.