Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Head sort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD - creator is a sock. GiantSnowman 13:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Head sort

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced original research. None of the references mentions anything about this technique. Rather, this article seems to exist to promote a non-notable, proprietary software package. See also Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Psychonaut (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * delete I'd just prodded this, but it seems that it has already been so. WP:OR personal essay by an editor with a problematic track record of such things. Sorting is a massively studied topic and, like free energy, it is easy for basement geniuses to invent new forms of it. However this is why we require independent sourcing, which this article does not have. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.