Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headliner (concert)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary as stated throughout the discussion.-- JForget  02:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Headliner (concert)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As it stands, no more than a dicdef, and I can't see that it can be anything more. Already defined in Wiktionary. Emeraude (talk) 13:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:WINAD is policy, and to expand on this would be original research.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kakofonous (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies WP:Notability as it is a well established term. While I do not see this article ever being large, I do see it becoming a concise but well-written one in the future. Zidel333 (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's exactly the point. A well-established term belongs in a dictionary.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 22:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Definitely has potential beyond a dictionary definition (which it currently is). Mostlyharmless (talk) 02:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you please provide some evidence that this is the case without violating core content policies WP:NOR, WP:V and WP:NOT?--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 07:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SorryGuy  Talk  19:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * delete dicdefs, no matter how notable, belong in a dictionary not an encyclopedia. Travellingcari (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - def only. will never be encyclopedic.  Gtstricky Talk or C 20:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's a separate project for dictionary definitions you know. That's where definitions of 'terms' belong, however notable.--Michig (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and Wiktionary already has an article regarding this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cuyler91093 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.