Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headplay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Headplay

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article reads like a brochure and has not given grounds for notability within wikipedia. I always have trouble with non notable companies making articles for there own products for cheap google indexing. UnlimitedAccess 02:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:COI? The   Wikipedist  04:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, due to no assertion of notability, and the strong flavour of spam. Goochelaar 14:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Again, no assertion of notability, and also per this. While checking the revision history, I noticed that the first revision included a left in probably by mistake when the user recreated the deleted page. I would tag it for G4, if it wasn't so substantially edited by the singular editor.  J- ſtan TalkContribs 20:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.