Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headquarters, Washington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Headquarters, Washington

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am 99 percent sure that this is another GNIS error; even just based on the name alone. Topos show what looks like a logging area. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Based on geographical references and the nearness of South Silver Lake Road, I think it's this 1950s Weyerhaueser logging headquarters. And since 1993, it's been the Headquarters Landfill.  Based on what I've found, I think the 1993-present landfill is notable, but based on what I've seen, I'm not convinced that the individual Weyerhaeuser HQ camp is notable. This is not a valid redirect, because neither the logging site nor the landfill are simply known as "Headquarters, Washington".  So delete I guess unless someone wants to transform this into an article about the landfill, although it might almost be better to start over with a clean page history at this point. Hog Farm Talk 02:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * We have Weyerhauser and the Columbia and Cowlitz Railway. Uncle G (talk) 03:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * delete Shades of Arizona, another case where map interpretation just isn't enough. Whether anything here was/is notable, this is a bogus name for it and needs to be suppressed. Mangoe (talk) 06:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - GNIS strikes again. FOARP (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Gusfriend (talk) 11:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.