Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heads Up For Tails


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is clear that the sources included don't contribute to establishing notability. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:16, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Heads Up For Tails

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor company, as judged by the funding. The reference are the usual Press releases disguised unconvincingly as newspaper articles. Some are even less than that: pure PR, as in VCCircle.  DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are lots of press releases available about the company if you search LiveMint, TOI/Economic Times and VCCircle. There is even one entire article in AsianAge where the founder of the company has described it in detail. There are also independent (non-news) websites where the founder has given interviews to promote the company. Despite so many sources, it has been nominated for deletion. Why is it than articles about India (and Asia) are nominated for deletion so often? I cannot help but feel this is a case of WP:BIAS and it is highly discouraging for me. This is a small emerging company but it is not fake. I have personally seen one of their three outlets.--DreamLinker (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Please don't get panic. If article complies WP guidelines it will not be deleted. Wikipedia is not biased about any race and nationality. It follows its policies. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 17:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Why would we be interested in "lots of press releases available about the company" when they aren't independent sources? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * keep There are enough independent and RS to pass notability. Though some clean up was needed. I did. I removed refs which looked pr and added more refs, finding from Google. If still needed any improvement to the article, please WP:FIXIT. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  04:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the sources I see I mostly PR driven or trivial mentions, not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. One of the keep voters suggests that this is sufficient coverage, as in:
 * "There is even one entire article in AsianAge where the founder of the company has described it in detail. There are also independent (non-news) websites where the founder has given interviews to promote the company." etc.
 * These are WP:SPIP sources that do not count towards establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Despite have quite a few references, nothing I see satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH. This one is close but it is basically an announcement so not useful. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.