Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headwall Photonics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Headwall Photonics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Corporate article that does not seem to meet WP:CORP. Most of the sources provided go in depth into the photonic industry instead of the company itself. It does mention a few industry awards for some of their products but, given the number of recipients for each, I wouldn't consider them to be that notable. Funny Pika! 23:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:00, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 01:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete: One would suspect that a company spun off from Aligent is likely able to meet CORP, but that is not so obvious in this case. Certainly Photonics' and R&D meets that requirement, but most of the other CITEs don't mention Headwall even in passing. My Google-fu turns up little other than re-printed press releases. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.