Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HealthFlow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 09:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

HealthFlow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:COI promotion of an academic (software, it seems) project. All sources are fairly recent wp:primary publications and one of their authors also wrote the Wikipedia page on healthcare workflow and made some edits to this page as well. The mostly WP:SPA user who wrote most of this page, probably has a COI too. Anyway, this doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. There are some hits in Google Books under this name, but they are mostly about Johnson & Johnson's Healthflow bottle and similar baby feeding products. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * They wrote a lot of papers about this and especially about its part/predecessor RetroGuide, but a Google Scholar search for the first/main author's name finds that all papers have less than 20 citations each, and most have single-digit citations, further suggesting lack of wp:notability. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.